Question before the Supreme Court: Did named elected officials honor their oath?
China Interfered in the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States and a conspiracy existed by and between these named Defendants to defraud the United States of America . . . by rigging and/or allowing to be rigged the 2020 election process.
Supreme Court Case 22-380 Brunson vs. Adams, et al
Who is the "et al" - Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 94 Senators, as well as over 100 members of the House of Representatives.
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to hear this case.
Question before the Court: Did we honor our oath?
"This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States."
See video below.
"This is a reading of Supreme court case 22-380 Brunson VS. Adams.
It alleges that the 2020 election was rigged and it lists the defendants, 94 U.S. State Senators and 129 members of the House of representatives, Joesph R. Biden and Kamala Harris as well as former Vice President Mike Pence, in a conspiracy to defraud the United States and Mr. Brunson, by rigging or allowing to be rigged the 2020 election process. It calls for amongst other things the removal of 94 Senators, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris as well as over 100 members of the House of Representatives for being part of the conspiracy to rig the 2020 elections and overthrow the duly elected leader of the United States. Questions presented in the brief are:
A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.
In addition, there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every Court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.
***This document is public use, there is no copyright. Feel free to share.***
Links:
(Supreme Court Case Number 22-380) https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
(Brunson VS. Adams On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals For The Tenth Circuit) https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf