Remember Randy Quaid? Maybe He Wasn't So "Crazy" After All.
- Németh Debs

- Nov 17, 2021
- 2 min read
Updated: Nov 23, 2021
Randy Quaid warned us that 8 actors (including Heath Ledger, Chris Penn, David Carradine) were "whacked" by a Tribe of bottom feeders comprising a criminal network of individuals, including accountants and lawyers, that is facilitated by Google.
He warned that Mel Gibson, Brittany Spears, and Lindsey Lohan (among others) have been targeted for financial ruin by this Tribe that was aiming for the actor's royalties.
Sounds exactly like Michael Jackson's and even Prince's predicament with the same criminal element. We know how that worked out for them. Also, if you recall Dave Chappell found himself in a peculiar position once upon a time when he determined abruptly that he had to go into hiding on the continent of Africa no less just to get away from this Tribe lest he sell his soul.
Look up his interview with that devil Oprah that was conducted upon his return from hiding. He couldn't even tell his own wife where he was and if I recall did not even attempt to contact her for at least a month.
There are a number of other similar cases, including Marin Lawrence who They tried to do in as well. I've highlighted some of these cases on debarelli.com in the past. Let's not forget Bill Cosby.
The most significant thing to understand about the Cosby case is that wording is what did him in. When it comes to the lifestyles that these Hollywood and Entertainment Industry individuals live it is has always been degenerate. Drugs and debauchery has always been the culture. Their lifestyle. So, as it pertains to quaaludes, when in Mr. Cosby's deposition statement he is asked the damning question that calls for a binary Yes or No response, this was a legal trick. A Set up. We are speaking legalities here. This is what has always stood out to me and why I have always thought that he was railroaded in order to set the stage for the #MeToo movement.
He was asked point blank and on face value, "did you give blah blah quaaludes?" Well, yes he in fact did technically "give" so and so quaaludes. They got him to say it. It is very simple. They are treacherous. However, understand that by him saying he gave whomever quaaludes that is not to say that "whomever" did not ask him for those quaaludes. Come on now.
People get caught up on Baalshit far too easily. Let me try to explain in example form. If a judge were to ask let's say in a sales transaction, "did you give so and so the item?" Lots of people will say, "No". I didn't "give" anything to anyone. I sold it to them. But actually they gave you money and you gave them the item. People get caught up on wording and these people that we are contending against in society even now, know that; but how tf did Cosby's attorney not rebut that question? It's so subtle I know. Maybe not the best articulation in the example I admit but what I'm trying to say is that words, wording, and understanding are the weapons and tricks they utilize.
Remember, legalities are veritable tricks and trickery. Words, wording, and understanding are what They use against the public too. M'kay?





Comments