top of page




THE French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the history of Europe since the fall of Rome.

A new phenomenon then appeared before the world.

Never before had a mob apparently organised successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those slogans.

Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other sections; and still less swept away every feature of the national life and tradition, from King, religion, nobles,

clergy, constitution, flag, calendar, and place names to coinage.

Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention especially in view of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in many countries.

The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact : the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France.

It was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which had been France.

This conclusion is borne out by the references to “foreigners”in high places in the Revolutionary Councils,

not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robespierre himself.

We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals ; they were, of course, Jews.

Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it ;

“Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of ‘Great.’ The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.”

Protocols of Zion—No.7.

“We Were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.’ The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and

with them carried away the well-being of the world. The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists

and Communists, freedom to wreck your own country).” Protocols of Zion—No.l

With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution.

The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected

human drama.

When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality “Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic.”

Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organisation, and

vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary are necessary for its successful preparation.

It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that “mobs”or “the people ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and costly operation.

No mistake moreover could be more dangerous ; for it will result in total

inability to recognise the true significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.

The process of organising revolution is seen to be firstly the infliction of

paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows.

It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of publicity control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret organisations in the doomed state.

Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-mastering grip.

Through it men in high places are

suborned, and alien powers and influences are introduced into the body politic.

When the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on industrialists.

The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow.

Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.

By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France.

The world’s big financiers were firmly established.

“They possessed so large a share of the world’s gold and silver stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France.”

So writes Mr. McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page 38:

“A Change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals ; but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money

to which the title ‘credit ’had been given.’

The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means insurmountable, except in terms of gold and had the King’s advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted.

As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the international usurers.

Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France produced.

And who were the potentates of the new debt machine, these manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?

The late Lady Queenborough, in her important work Occult Theocrasy gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from L’Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894. In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid

and his brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montiflore, as being directly concerned in financing the French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace.

These names recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read :

“The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed gold from circulation

as far as possible.”

And Again :

“Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . . come begging with outstretched palm.”

No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir Walter Scott in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes these situation financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances. By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were

brought to total confusion.”

King Louis’ chief finance minister during these last years of growing confusion was Necker, “a Swiss” of German extraction, son of a German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes “Necker had forced his way into the King’s Treasury as a representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system.”

We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in Necker ; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why the national finances of France under his baneful gis rapidly worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate King’s government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of £170,000,000.

By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillip Duc de Chartres afterwards d’Orleans became Grand Master.

This type of freemasonry was largely

innocent, both in policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.

The Duc d’Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after his base and ignominious role had been played.

The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of the Revolution was cast in much the same role.

He was a much abler man than d’Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all his own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his own father.

He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the Jewish illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess Mrs. Herr than was her husband.

He was not only an early figure-head in French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced Illuminism into France.

This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind

freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organised by cabbalistic Jews.

It is interesting to note that the Duc d’Orleans and Talleyrand were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.

In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to warn France and Europe against these massing powers of evil. Lightning struck dead a

messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.

The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world revolution.

Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered. French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was too far advanced, and no action resulted.

By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.

Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organisation covering the whole of France.

Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d’Orleans in 1773.

Little did Egalité suspect the satanic powers that he was invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were.

The name Lucifer means “Light Bearer”; and Illuminati those who were lit by that light.

By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organisations was complete.

Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.

This was the manner of its accomplishment.

By 1780 d’Orleans’entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders. In 1781, in return for accommodation,

he signed papers handing over his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every variety of public debauchery.

In fact, Egalité’s financial masters used his name and property to instal a collosal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature ; and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.

As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood :—“ It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city.” It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at the Palais Royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic works, who was said “to study the politics of love because of his love for politics.”

This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon any public

characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their way.

This process was known as “L’infamie.” Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this typically Jewish form of attack.

No lie or abuse was too vile to level at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented

a considerable obstacle to the revolution.

She had, moreover, received many warnings regarding freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister some years previously I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry

too much about freemasonry.

Here it is far from having the significance that it may have elsewhere in Europe.

Here every thing is open and one knows all. Then where could the danger be ? One might well be worried if it were a question of a political secret society.

But on the contrary the government lets it spread, and it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of which are union and charity. One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organising plots.

Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on the lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the children of their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters. What harm is there in all that?

What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker designs?

Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on to them the contents of the Queen’s letter; and we can imagine them shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen; and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would convert secret conspiracy into the “massacres ofSeptember” and the blood baths of the guillotine.

In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and hunger in Paris.

A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was ordered at the Court jewelers in the Queen’s name by an agent of the Jacobins.

The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in such a bad financial way.

The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full blast on to the subject: and every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.

A further scandal was then engineered for the presses.

Some prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the Queen and by a forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal, supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the subject of the necklace.

This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning the whole affair.

The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro, alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabbalistic art, and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by Weishaupt in 1774.

When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason.

Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs.

After eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of publicity was complete.

In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the King to summon the Estates General, the first portion of their plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were


It now only remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in their place, when the guillotine’s work was done, citizen hewers of wood and drawers of water under an alien financial


From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in motion ; each more violent than the one proceeding it; each unmasking fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind the revolution, is set aside ; and his head rolls into the basket to join those of

his victims of yesterday.

Phillip Egalité, Duc d’Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for the revolution ; to protect with his name and influence the infancy of the revolutionary club; to popularise

freemasonry and the Palais Royal: and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to Versailles.

The “women” on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d’Orleans was under the impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King.

The real planners of the march.

however, had other schemes in view. One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and under

the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the Jacobins were supreme.

They continued to make use of Egalité right up to the time of the vote on the King’s life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin.

His masters thereafter had no further use for his services ; and he very shortly followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the executions of all classes.

Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalité. He had intended that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis as a democratic monarch with himself as chief


He had no desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still commanding his army.

He was the last of the moderates

and monarchists to dominate the Jacobin club of Paris ; that

bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and Illuminati.

It was Mirabeau’s voice, loud and resonant, that kept in check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.

There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so industriously to unchain.

In his last attempt to save the royal family by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down all opposition in the Jacobin club.

That evening he died by a sudden and violent illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace writes:

“Louis was not ignorant that

Mirabeau had been poisoned.”

Thus, like Phillip Egalité, and later Danton and Robespierre, Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.

We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion

“We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it.”

And again

“In This way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much.”

As “He Mr. B died at Scudder a moment writes when in his the

Life revolution of Mirabeau :—might still have been checked.”

The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important occasions during these first revolutionary stages.

He was one of those simple freemasons, who are borne they

know not whether, in a ship they have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are totally ignorant.

While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence, notably in the march of the women

to Versailles, during the attack on the Tuileries, and at the Champs de Mars.

He, too, desired the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no threat to the King even from Phillip Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost hostility during and after the march of the women to Versailles, believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.

He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the Assembly forced Louis to declare.

Once he did dash back to Paris in an effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war.

Mirabeau’s death followed, and Louis’ fate was sealed.

The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robespierre, and the fanatics of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.

In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible “September massacres”; 8,000 persons were murdered in the prisons of Paris alone, and many more over the country.

It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of the Commune.

Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much concerning the influences which were at work behind the scenes.

In his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30

“The Demand of the Communauté de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins, was, of course, for blood.”

Again, on page 56 he writes :

The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.

“The Power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris. where Robespierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue.” (Author’s italics.)

Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work :—“

The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners.” Some of the names of these “foreigners”are worthy of note.

There was Chiodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said to be of Spanish origin. There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already mentioned.

He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie Antoinette. There was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee of Public

Security, which “tried”the victims.

His voice was always raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend used to preface his “bloody work of the day with the professional phrase, ‘let us grind enough of the Red ‘.“David it was who inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organised “the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every external sign of

rational devotion.” (Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2.)

There were Reuben and Gohir, two of the five “Directors,” who with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of Robespierre, being known as the Directory. The terms Directors’ and Elders” are, of course,

characteristically Jewish.

One other observation should be made here ; it is that this important work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his other works, and is almost unobtainable.

Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir Walter Scott’s evidence regarding the powers behind the French Revolution.

To return to the scene in Paris. Robespierre now remains alone, and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only appearance. Let us turn to the Life of Robespierre,

by one G. Renier, who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes :

“From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robespierre) the terror was at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least of all Robespierre. Some 20 men (the

Committees of Public Safety and of General Security) shared the power.”

“On The 28th July, 1794,” to quote Mr. Renier again, “Robespierre Made a long speech before the Convention.. a Phillip against ultra-terrorists . . . uttering vague general accusations. ‘I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of iniquity.

But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic ; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base ‘.“

Mr. Renier continues with all a Jew’s satisfaction “Had he not spoken these words he might still have

triumphed ! In this smug sentence Mr. Renier unwittingly dots the i’s and crosses the t’s, which Robespierre had left uncompleted.

Robespierre’s allusion to the “corrupting and secret foreigners”was getting altogether too near the mark ; a little more and the full truth would be out.

At 2 a.m. that night Robespierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following day dragged to the guillotine.

Again let us recall Protocol 15 “In This way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much.”

Note.—in a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future to

finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar to the debt free money known as “Greenbacks,”with which he had financed the Civil War.


49 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page