The "Judeo" in Judeo-Christianity Signals Its Satanization


Satanism Rampant--How?--Isn't this "Christian Country"?--NO, sucker, not by a long-shot....

Since the late 1800's we began letting them into our Christian nation. They arrived in untold numbers as attested to by Henry Ford. "Undocumented". Almost immediately, They began warring upon the Christian Heritage and Culture of this Great Nation, and here we find ourselves in ruins.

The Snake:

On her way to work one morning

Down the path alongside the lake

A tender-hearted woman saw a poor half-frozen snake

His pretty colored skin had been all frosted with the dew

“Oh well,” she cried, “I'll take you in and I'll take care of you”

“Take me in oh tender woman

Take me in, for heaven's sake

Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake

She wrapped him up all cozy in a curvature of silk

And then laid him by the fireside with some honey and some milk

Now she hurried home from work that night as soon as she arrived

She found that pretty snake she'd taken in had been revived

“Take me in, oh tender woman

Take me in, for heaven's sake

Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake

Now she clutched him to her bosom, “You're so beautiful,” she cried

“But if I hadn't brought you in by now you might have died”

Now she stroked his pretty skin and then she kissed and held him tight

But instead of saying thanks, that snake gave her a vicious bite

“Take me in, oh tender woman

Take me in, for heaven's sake

Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake

“I saved you,” cried that woman

“And you've bit me even, why?

You know your bite is poisonous and now I'm going to die”

“Oh shut up, silly woman,” said the reptile with a grin

“You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in

”Take me in, oh tender woman

Take me in, for heaven's sake

Take me in oh tender woman,“ sighed the snake

The has always been Zionism.


Quote: You utterly, totally mis-understand the Christian myth--which has replaced the Homeric Iliad and Oddysey. The real Christian God is TRUTH (see Gosp. JOHN 14:6), this truth directly implying the necessary OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality underlying any such truth. The man, "Christ," is mere character for the story who might have existed or might not--can't be proven one way or the other.

1. HOW can there be "truth" unless there's "God-given" OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality upon which such truth is necessarily based? --this is simple, basic philosophy, not difficult for anyone to grasp.

2. The source of inferiority complex: No one, in entire history of philosophy and human-kind, has ever successfully demonstrated a genuine premise for this child's "good-evil" that stood-up for all criticisms, conditions, and problems. Thus the pretext of general subjectivism is planted and sprouted in the society by means of this Pharisaism, known in Christian theology as Pelagianism (of St. Augustine), which the thorough-going extreme subjectivists and outright satanists exploit and use to leverage the entire society and population, the classic example being the poor, stupid people not capable of resisting the "currency" fraud, always complaining there isn't enough "money," thus they want and insist upon the "currency" fraud (though most of the fools cannot grasp the nature of the fraud).

3. White-Supremacy"?--What Exactly Is It Supposed To Mean?--Just Another stupid Buzz-Phrase So what is "white-supremacy"?-- Are u a "white-supremacist"? Why wouldn't white folks want this white-supremacy? So do white folks think white is "supreme"?--but, "supreme" in what?--everything? Thus some seem to pretend there's something wrong w. "white-supremacy"--like there's something wrong w. "racism," this racism being something pretended to be wrong or bad or evil or immoral, etc. And of course, whites are supposed to deny being racists, being loyal to their people, and to deny advocacy of "white-supremacy"--whatever that's supposed to mean. So does "white-supremacy" refer to something metaphysical?--like, do whites live longer, or jump higher, or something metaphysical like that? We know that the accuser is "smart," right? So how could whites be "supreme" if they are so "smart"? Does God like white folks more than anyone else?--is that what's meant by "white-supremacy"? Or is it POLITICAL "supremacy" which is meant?--and what actually would be wrong w. that? But after all, a real equality would be good enough--"supremacy" might have problems attached--like if there was a hierarchy of such "supremacy," including something like an aristocracy. And shouldn't whites be satisfied w. being white?--is that "supremacy"? So u see "white-supremacy" is a quite questionable notion, rather lacking for specific meaning, and it's just another buzz-phrase put-out by filth who, as always, want to keep the races fighting one-another, pretending such "white-supremacy" is somehow wrong or bad, etc.

4. What Then Is Talmudism, Actually?--Isn't It Satanic Hatred Of Humanity?--So WHO hates WHO?--And Aren't Terms of Hatred Imposed Upon Gentiles?

5. Good-evil" is for children and dogs who are merely dis-obedient, and who are thus intimidated by appellation of such "good-evil" metaphor, otherwise meaningless. (the source of inferiority complex)

6. Racism is axiomatic, meaning one can't NOT be "racist" , for one is loyal to some race, mixed or non mixed, to ones own race , or to some other. For if one practices the ways of some culture or religion, that's effective loyalty to that culture or religion.

38 views0 comments